CFDG asks GGNRA for workable definition of voice control

In mid-April, CFDG sent a letter to the GGNRA to develop a workable definition of voice control and for the manufacturing of signs per the 1979 Pet Policy in Marin and San Francisco counties.  CFDG proposed that we would pay for the signage and the GGNRA would provide the labor to install the Pet Policy signage.

CFDG worked closely with our Congressional delegation to get their support to install this pet signage throughout the GGNRA.

In short, the GGNRA responded to our letter on April 28, 2021 and stated that they “have a signage plan underway for 6 park sites including the Crissy Field Wildlife Protection Area”, no later than this Fall.

In her response, GGNRA Superintendent Joss did not reply to our request for a fuller discussion of their definition of “voice control” which is very problematic for we, the public and for the Park staff to enforce such an impractical definition.

CFDG wrote back to Superintendent Joss on April 29, 2021 for further clarification about a workable voice control definition and get a better understanding about their “six park sites” that may get signage.  More specifically, we asked the GGNRA what precise language will be on the signs, locations of the signs and the timeline associated with the installation of the signage.  Additionally, CFDG requested that GGNRA provide a workable defintion of voice control.

As a follow up, CFDG will engage in a zoom call with Brian Aviles, GGNRA’s Chief of Planning on May 19th to discuss our outstanding questions about the above mentioned issues and the status of the Crissy Field Next Project.

Superintendent Joss has not responded our April 29, 2021 letter.